Business // Stigma Surrounding Mental Health Treatment in the Workplace
Stigma Surrounding Mental Health Treatment in the Workplace
Background of a Problem
Business leaders these days failed to recognize the rising pressure in the workplace. These frontrunners who miscarried their duties to distinguish this workplace tension should adopt all-embracing programs to discuss the stigma surrounding mental health treatment in the workplace. A few corporate frontrunners tried to consider this topic important by solving the issues; however, they could not resolve the stigma surrounding mental health treatment. Many employees felt scared to find jobs and secure decent employment due to the stigma concerning mental health treatment. In this particular research, I would emphasize the role of corporate executives to create new programs to address this stigma in mental health treatment and provide solutions to stop the problem (Follmer & Jones, 2018). As cited, business leaders could lessen the growing problems that manufactured sweeping contrary effects for business managers and employees. A few emerging programs, in which business leaders worked hard to resolve the stigma regarding mental health treatment, became operational. However, other corporate executives should not ignore the problems. Instead, they should exert their efforts and work hard to dismantle the components of stigma in mental health treatment to liberate these employees from humiliation (Brouwers, 2020). Although corporate leaders worked with their healthcare providers to disassemble the elements of the stigma that endanger employees’ chance to receive assistance and support for mental health treatment, they should create new and effective programs to address the stigma in mental health treatment and concerns.
Concepts Influencing the Development of the Background of the Problem
- External Environmental Analysis
As a researcher, I should consider the implications of external environmental analysis in developing the Background of the Problem. I should contemplate the organizational and societal factors to contribute to the stigma surrounding mental health treatment in the workplace. With a comprehensive and in-depth analysis, I could endeavor to reshape people’s attitudes, as well as perceptions towards mental health. For that reason, these attitudes and perceptions could thereby influence the contexts of the problem.
- Stakeholder Analysis
Integrating a shareholder analysis into the Background of the Problem would allow me to deepen my understanding of the involved actors and their perspectives on mental health treatment stigma (Elraz, 2018). I could highlight the interests, potential contributions, and roles of the key stakeholders, such as employees, employers, human resources managers, and mental health professionals in addressing the issue.
Establishing Connections to Familiarize the Readers with the Topic
As a researcher, I could build links between me and my readers. I should explain the stigma surrounding mental health treatment in the workplace (Javed et al., 2021). In this case, I could make my readers find connections to make:
- Linking to Organizational Context
As a researcher, I should ensure that my topic remained clear and understandable. I had to establish connections between my topic and my readers. In this case, my readers could gain a better understanding of how stigma would impact employee welfare, productivity, and total organizational performance. As a researcher, my effort to establish connections between my topic and my readers helped me ascertain the importance and significance of the research problem within a business context.
- Aligning with Mental Health Initiatives
As a researcher, I should draw strong connections to current mental health initiatives, within and outside the workplace. These measures and steps could help readers and target audiences familiarize themselves with the ongoing efforts and seek solutions to address mental health challenges (Tay, Alcock, & Scior, 2018). For me, emphasizing the main association between the stigma surrounding mental health treatment and the effectiveness of these programs and mental health initiatives could validate the need for further research process and involvement.
Incorporating Key Learning Outcomes for the Course
In this research, I should incorporate the key learning outcomes of the Background of the Problem. The statements of these learning outcomes should be about:
- Applying Research Methodologies
The focus of this statement concentrated on the application of research methodologies. As well, these methodologies would cover sections, such as qualitative and quantitative data analysis techniques, pieces of related literature reviews, and survey designs. Additionally, these research methodologies remained indispensable in investigating the consequences and reasons for the stigma surrounding mental health treatment in work settings.
- Analytical Thinking and Problem Formulation
As a researcher, I should determine the research gaps. I should check the Background of the Problem and exhibit analytical thinking by estimating the prevailing literature on stigma and recognizing gaps in knowledge. I should know that the problem formulation process would involve describing and outlining the research questions. In this case, this formulation of the problem would address these gaps, while facilitating a strategic approach to addressing and resolving the issue of stigma and its suggestions.
Avoiding Checklist Creep and Refining the Background of the Problem
As a researcher, I should evade Checklist Creep while refining the Background of the Problem. Ensuring that the course content on the stigma surrounding mental health treatment in the workplace would help improve the Background of the Problem in the following ways:
- Strategic Focus
The course content of this paper would guide me to understand the role of strategic focus in the study. Aside from that, the course content helped me maintain a strategic focus on the research problem. After evaluating all components in the Background of the Problem, I could warrant the alignment of the research objectives to evade needless information.
- Synthesis of Literature
As a researcher, I should discuss the comprehensive issue found in the Background of the Problem. The issue found in the course content would help me assist in collecting and synthesizing pieces of relevant literature on mental health treatment stigma in work settings (Elraz, 2018). This task helped me ensure that relevant and impactful studies were useful as found in the Background of the Problem. This synthesis of literature would contribute to a complete and nuanced understanding of the research problem.
- Continuous Self-Assessment
In research, researchers should, generally, administer a regular self-assessment. For me, I should conduct a regular self-assessment against checklist items as outlined in the DBA Traditional Doctoral Study Capstone Research Handbook. Of course, a continuous self-assessment would help guarantee that the Background of the Problem could remain aligned, coherent, and focused on the strategic direction of the research. Hence, integrating feedback from consultants would help me refine my problem statement.
In the end, applying effective strategic planning and concepts to the development of research particularly in the Background of the Problem could help me enhance the connection to, quality for, and relevance of the research objectives. This particular approach would then ensure that the problem of stigma surrounding mental health treatment in work settings would end. For that reason, I should maintain and validate a strategic focus on the impact of the problem, while exploring the organizational and societal context and aligning with key learning outcomes to avoid the Checklist Creep.
References
Brouwers, E. (2020). Social stigma is an underestimated contributing factor to unemployment in people with mental illness or mental health issues: Position paper and future directions. BMC Psychology, 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-020-00399-0
Elraz, H. (2018). Identity, mental health, and work: How employees with mental health conditions recount stigma and the pejorative discourse of mental illness. Human Relations, 71(5), 722–741. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726717716752
Follmer, K. B., & Jones, K. S. (2018, January 1). Mental Illness in the Workplace: An Interdisciplinary Review and Organizational Research Agenda. Journal of Management, 44(1), 325.
Javed, A., Lee, C., Zakaria, H., Buenaventura, R. D., Cetkovich-Bakmas, M., Duailibi, K., Ng, B., Ramy, H., Saha, G., Arifeen, S., Elorza, P. M., Ratnasingham, P., & Azeem, M. W. (2021). Reducing the stigma of mental health disorders with a focus on low- and middle-income countries. Asian Journal of Psychiatry, 58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajp.2021.102601
Tay, S., Alcock, K., & Scior, K. (2018). Mental health problems among clinical psychologists: Stigma and its impact on disclosure and help-seeking. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 74(9), 1545–1555. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.22614
2017/5157
